HOME PENDAFTARAN LOGIN MEMBER LIST IKLAN
AGROBISNIS
BISNIS WARALABA
BUKU
EBOOK
ELEKTRONIK KONSUMEN
FASHION PRIA
FASHION WANITA
HOBI
HP & AKSESORIS
INTERNET
INVESTASI
JASA
KESEHATAN & KECANTIKAN
LAIN-LAIN
MAKANAN & MINUMAN
MOBIL
MOBIL AKSESORIS
MOBIL ONDERDIL
PELUANG BISNIS
KOMPUTER & LAPTOP
PERLENGKAPAN ANAK
PERLENGKAPAN BAYI
PERLENGKAPAN OLAHRAGA
PERLENGKAPAN KANTOR
PERLENGKAPAN RUMAH
RUMAH RUKO DISEWAKAN
RUMAH RUKO DIJUAL
SEPEDA MOTOR
WEBSITE
WISATA
PAKET UMROH AKHIR RAMADHAN 2017 di Cisaat

PAKET UMROH AKHIR RAMADHAN 2017

Mengapa Memilih Travel Alhijaz Indowisata

Umroh 2017

 

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017 Travel Haji dan Umrah  Alhijaz Indowisata memberikan informasi berbasis online tentang Biaya Paket Haji Umroh 2017,  Harga Paket Haji Umroh 2017, Paket Umroh Promo 2017, Daftar Paket Haji Umroh 2017, Travel Paket Haji Umroh 2017, Info Paket Haji Umroh 2017 , Situs Resmi Biaya Haji Umroh 2017 , Situs Resmi Info Haji Umroh 2017, Situs Resmi Daftar Haji Umroh 2017, Situs Resmi Promo Umroh 2017  dari Travel Haji dan Umrah  Alhijaz Indowisata.

Ada beberapa variabel dalam mencari

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017 yaitu:

1. Maskapai

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017 menggunakan Maskapai Saudia Airlines yang langsung jakarta Jeddah tanpa transit.

Paket Umroh Promo 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017 Travel Haji Umroh Alhijaz Indowisata Paket Hemat. Promo, Ekonomis dan terjangkau untuk perjalanan umroh 9 hari dengan maskapai Saudia Airlines

2. Jadwal Keberangkatan

Dengan tetap mengkedepankan aspek kepastian tanggal keberangkatan, kenyamanan dan kekhususan jamaah selama beribadah, Info Paket Umroh Januari 2017 Travel Haji Umroh Alhijaz Indowisata ini memberikan informasi tentang rencana keberangkatkan di Tahun 2017 di bulan Ramadhan 2017 Ibadah Umroh selama 9 hari.

3. Paket Umroh

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017 Travel Haji Umroh Alhijaz Indowisata meliputi

  1. PAKET UMROH REGULER

Paket Umroh Reguler adalah Paket Umroh dengan harga lebih hemat dan terjangkau dengan Perjalanan menggunakan Maskapai Saudia Airlines dan Hotel Fasilitas Bintang *3/ Setaraf.

Hotel Madinah : Muhtara International/ setaraf *3

Paket Umroh Promo 2017

                                                     Hotel Madinah :  Muhtara International Hotel Bintang *3 / Setaraf

Hotel Mekkah : Mobark Plaza / setaraf *3

Paket Umroh Promo 2017

                                                                    Hotel Mekkah Mubark Plaza / Setaraf Hotel Bintang *3

  1. PAKET UMROH STANDART

Paket Umroh Standart  adalah Paket Umroh dengan harga lebih hemat dan terjangkau dengan Perjalanan menggunakan Maskapai Saudia Airlines dan Hotel Madinah Muhtara International / Setaraf Hotel Bintang 3, Hotel di Mekkah Tower Zama zam / Setaraf Hotel Bintang *5

Hotel Madinah : Muhtara International/ setaraf Hotel Bintang *3

Paket Umroh Promo 2017

                                                            Hotel Madinah :  Muhtara International  / Setaraf Hotel Bintang *3

Hotel Mekkah : Mobark Plaza / setaraf  Hotel Bintang *3

                                                     Hotel Mekkah Tower Zam zam  / Setaraf Hotel Bintang *5

 

Biaya perlengkapan dan airport tax handling P. Jawa,Lampung : Rp 1.000.000
Biaya Pengiriman luar P. Jawa , Lampung, di tanggung jamaah

BIAYA UMROH SUDAH TERMASUK :

  • Tiket Pesawat Saudia/ Garuda PP (CGK-JED-CKG)
  • Visa Umroh
  • AKomodasi Hotel di Tanah Suci
  • Makan 3x SEhari
  • Pembimbing Ibadah / Muthawif
  • Manasik Umroh 1x Di Kantor AlHijaz
  • Ziarah Mekkah , Madinah & City Tour Jeddah
  • Air Zam-Zam 1 Galon (5 Liter)

BIAYA UMROH BELUM TERMASUK :

  • Pembuatan Passport
  • Tiket Pesawat dari daerah ke Jakarta
  • Suntik Meningitis
  • Biaya Airport Tax Handling & Perlengkapan Ibadah Rp. 1000.000,-

KONSULTASI HAJI UMROH
PT. Al-Hijaz IndoWisata Tour & Travel
Graha Alhijaz Jl. Dewi Sartika No. 239, Cawang Jakarta Timur 13630

Contact Person
Nurti P. Purbasari

CALL /SMS / WA 081288843990
CALL /SMS / WA 082124065740

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

Paket Umroh Ramadhan Akhir 2017

biaya umroh dalam rupiah

harga paket umroh 2017

harga paket umroh 2017
biaya umroh berapa juta bekasi
biaya umroh berapa juta

berapa biaya umroh dalam rupiah

berapa biaya umroh dalam rupiah

berapa biaya umroh dalam rupiah
berapa biaya umroh dalam rupiah

berapa biaya umroh plus
berapa biaya umroh plus

paket umroh promo 2017
paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017
harga paket umroh 2017
harga paket umroh 2017

harga paket umroh 2017

harga paket umroh 2017

Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya

Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya

Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya

Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya
Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya

Travel Umroh Murah Dan Terpercaya
biro perjalanan haji dan umroh terbaik

biro perjalanan haji dan umroh terbaik

biaya umroh 2017 bekasi

biaya umroh 2017 bekasi
biaya umroh 2017 bekasi
biaya umroh 2017 bekasi

biaya umroh 2017 bekasi

biaya umroh 2017 bekasi

biaya umroh 2017 bekasi
biaya umroh 2017 jakarta Timur
biaya umroh 2017 jakarta Timur
biaya umroh 2017 jakarta Timur
biaya umroh 2017 jakarta Timur

biaya umroh 2017 Depok

biaya umroh 2017 Depok

biaya umroh 2017 Depok

biaya umroh 2017 Depok
biaya umroh 2017 Depok
biaya umroh 2017 Bogor
biaya umroh 2017 Bogor

biaya umroh 2017 Bogor
biaya umroh 2017 Bogor

biaya umroh 2017 Bogor

biaya umroh 2017 Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah
biaya umroh dalam rupiah
biaya umroh dalam rupiah

biaya umroh dalam rupiah

biaya umroh dalam rupiah
biaya umroh dalam rupiah

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah bekasi

biaya umroh dalam rupiah bekasi

biaya umroh dalam rupiah bekasi
biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta
biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta
biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta timur

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta timur

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta timur

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta timur

biaya umroh dalam rupiah jakarta timur

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Depok

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Depok

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Depok
biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor

biaya umroh dalam rupiah Bogor
umroh murah Jakarta

umroh murah Jakarta
umroh murah bekasi

umroh murah bekasi

umroh murah bekasi

umroh murah bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017

paket umroh murah 2017

paket umroh murah 2017
paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 Bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 Bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 Bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 Bogor
paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta selatan
paket umroh murah 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh murah 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

paket umroh murah 2017 bekasi

 

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 depok
paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 depok

paket umroh murah 2017 depok
paket umroh murah 2017 bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 bogor
paket umroh murah 2017 bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 bogor

paket umroh murah 2017 bogor
paket umroh murah 2017 tangerang
paket umroh murah 2017 tangerang
paket umroh murah 2017 tangerang

biaya umroh murah bekasi

biaya umroh murah bekasi

biaya umroh murah bekasi

biaya umroh murah bekasi

biaya umroh murah bekasi

biaya umroh murah bekasi

travel umroh terbaik di bekasi

travel umroh terbaik di bekasi

biro perjalanan haji dan umroh di bekasi

paket umroh murah bekasi
paket umroh murah bekasi

harga paket umroh 2017 bekasi

harga paket umroh 2017 bekasi

harga paket umroh 2017 bekasi

harga paket umroh 2017 jakarta

harga paket umroh 2017 jakarta

harga paket umroh 2017 jakarta

harga paket umroh 2017 jakarta

harga paket umroh 2017 jakarta
harga paket umroh 2017 Jakarta timur

harga paket umroh 2017 Jakarta timur

harga paket umroh 2017 Jakarta timur
harga paket umroh 2017 depok

harga paket umroh 2017 depok
harga paket umroh 2017 bogor

harga paket umroh 2017 bogor

harga paket umroh 2017 bogor

harga paket umroh 2017 bogor

harga paket umroh 2017 bogor
paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017

paket umroh promo 2017
paket umroh promo 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 Jakarta

paket umroh promo 2017 bekasi

paket umroh promo 2017 bekasi

paket umroh promo 2017 bekasi
paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta timur
paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta timur

paket umroh promo 2017 jakarta timur
paket umroh promo 2017 depok

paket umroh promo 2017 depok

paket umroh promo 2017 depok
paket umroh promo 2017 bogor

paket umroh promo 2017 bogor
paket umroh promo 2017 bogor
travel umroh di depok

travel umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel haji dan umroh di depok

travel umroh terbaik di depok

travel umroh terbaik di depok

travel umroh terbaik di depok

travel umroh terbaik di depok
travel umroh bekasi timur

travel umroh bekasi timur

travel umroh bekasi timur

paket umroh april 2017
paket umroh april 2017

paket umroh april 2017

paket umroh april 2017
Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Paket Umroh Mei 2017

paket umroh maret 2017
paket umroh maret 2017

paket umroh maret 2017

paket umroh maret 2017
promo umroh murah 2017

promo umroh murah 2017

promo umroh murah 2017

promo umroh murah 2017

Biaya Travel Paket Umroh April 2017 Semarang
Biaya Travel Paket Umroh April 2017 Semarang
Biaya Travel Paket Umroh April 2017 Semarang
Promo Paket Umroh Mei 2017

Promo Paket Umroh Mei 2017

 


The Uphill Battle to Better Regulate Formaldehyde

WASHINGTON — A decade after emergency trailers meant to shelter Hurricane Katrina victims instead caused burning eyes, sore throats and other more serious ailments, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of regulating the culprit: formaldehyde, a chemical that can be found in commonplace things like clothes and furniture.

But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.

The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.

Continue reading the main story
 

Document: The Formaldehyde Fight

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.

The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.

“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”

The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.

What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.

Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.

“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.

Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.

Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.

Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”

Continue reading the main story

Formaldehyde in Laminate Flooring

In laminate flooring, formaldehyde is used as a bonding agent in the fiberboard (or other composite wood) core layer and may also be used in glues that bind layers together. Concerns were raised in March when certain laminate flooring imported from China was reported to contain levels of formaldehyde far exceeding the limit permitted by California.

Typical

laminate

flooring

CLEAR FINISH LAYER

Often made of melamine resin

PATTERN LAYER

Paper printed to resemble wood,

or a thin wood veneer

GLUE

Layers may be bound using

formaldehyde-based glues

CORE LAYER

Fiberboard or other

composite, formed using

formaldehyde-based adhesives

BASE LAYER

Moisture-resistant vapor barrier

What is formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is a common chemical used in many industrial and household products as an adhesive, bonding agent or preservative. It is classified as a volatile organic compound. The term volatile means that, at room temperature, formaldehyde will vaporize, or become a gas. Products made with formaldehyde tend to release this gas into the air. If breathed in large quantities, it may cause health problems.

WHERE IT IS COMMONLY FOUND

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Pressed-wood and composite wood products

Wallpaper and paints

Spray foam insulation used in construction

Commercial wood floor finishes

Crease-resistant fabrics

In cigarette smoke, or in the fumes from combustion of other materials, including wood, oil and gasoline.

Exposure to formaldehyde in sufficient amounts may cause eye, throat or skin irritation, allergic reactions, and respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing or asthma.

Long-term exposure to high levels has been associated with cancer in humans and laboratory animals.

Exposure to formaldehyde may affect some people more severely than others.

By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.

Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.

White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.

As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.

“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”

Senator Vitter’s staff was pleased.

“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.

Advertisement

The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)

But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.

Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.

“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”

Photo
 
Becky Gillette wants strong regulation of formaldehyde. Credit Beth Hall for The New York Times

Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.

Within a matter of weeks, two letters — using nearly identical language — were sent by House and Senate lawmakers to the E.P.A. — with the industry group forwarding copies of the letters to the agency as well, and then posting them on its website.

The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.

The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”

Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.

Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”

Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.

While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.

An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.

“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”

An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.

“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.

But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.

“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”

With Iran Talks, a Tangled Path to Ending Syria’s War

UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?

What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.

Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.

 

 

Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.

In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.

“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”

He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.

Advertisement

Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”

It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.

Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.

He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.

They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.

Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.

As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.

He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.

Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.

“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”

The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”

Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.

R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.

“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”

Untuk Info Lebih Detail, Silahkan Hubungi :
Nama : nurti purbasari
Telp : 082124065740
SMS/WA : 082124065740
Pin BB : 587EA2A1
Email : [email protected]
Website : www.umrohpaketmurah.com
Share this Advertise on :
Produk Iklan Terkait Lainnya :
Biaya Paket Umroh Maret 2017
Paket Umroh Promo 2017
Biaya Umroh Dalam Rupiah
Promo Paket Umroh Murah 2017
Biaya Paket Umroh Tahun 2017
Service AC Mobil Murah

Pusat Informasi Lowongan Kerja Terbaru 2017

Copyright © 2014 All right reserved | Created by SangMio | Supported by Pasang Iklan Baris Massal